Brunette gangbang creampie

Video сomments (24)

Taktilar wrote 26.02.2018, 23:28: #1
Nothing funny about ignoring the data... even worse to watch it done with such tired and pathiec rhetoric... Everyone is a racist, Hitler or Putin when you can't deal with facts.

Arashigore wrote 02.03.2018, 02:15: #2
I accomplished like four things today! I deserve a raise and a promotion, me thinks.

Mishakar wrote 09.03.2018, 11:12: #3
Rational, and the Left, aren't on speaking terms.

Tehn wrote 17.03.2018, 19:41: #4
I assume a comment that stupid has to be trolling.

Nataur wrote 26.03.2018, 10:29: #5
"Are they still doing this?"

Zolosho wrote 02.04.2018, 01:00: #6
Just because a story involves a real person does not mean that it is not fiction.

Kara wrote 03.04.2018, 20:30: #7
Hitch's book, like the religion books Dawkins writes, was polemic. It's meant to piss of religious folks and pat us atheists on the back for our rationality and superiority. You don't read it like it's a sober, academic work on the history of society or the development of religious thought, do you? You dared someone to point out inaccuracies in Hitch's work, and now you're handwaving away any inaccuracies the likes of which, in fact, abound in his work.

Mezimi wrote 08.04.2018, 14:20: #8
Rom 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

Vigis wrote 13.04.2018, 22:36: #9
The signs are there, yet a lot of people ignore them.

Gusar wrote 15.04.2018, 09:03: #10
Its accumulation of mutation over time more than likely. We humans alone pass down 100 or so to our kids. They add up, degenerate code, prevents change. That's the limiting factor of all genomes, but what keeps it bound to families? These 'galaxies of stars' like genetics has confirmed? Easy..Gods word. :) according to kinds.

Maujinn wrote 24.04.2018, 11:45: #11
I think asking this of "the Bible" is too much to ask and avoids necessary nuance. There are sections that are meant to be taken literally (or at least as literally as they can be, such as the Synoptics, Paul's letters, Exodus) and others that are meant not to be taken literal (Psalms, Song of Solomon). Others are much more disputed, such as the beginning of Genesis, Revelation and Job. So asking "should the Bible be taken literally or figuratively" is not the best question as it's too broad and general. Maybe the better question is how do we know what to take literally and what to take figuratively?

Malazuru wrote 26.04.2018, 15:39: #12
And there is confirmation. Thanks

Mezirn wrote 06.05.2018, 00:35: #13
I'm leaving early! Woohoo!

Araktilar wrote 11.05.2018, 02:13: #14
I thought gg was talking about John from PEI.

Tenris wrote 14.05.2018, 08:13: #15
If this isn't a pitch for TAD erotica, I don't know what is.

Vozragore wrote 19.05.2018, 23:40: #16
What rights? I have the right of freedom until some force stops it. A religion has never stopped my rights but a government will always stop that right. It is a conspiracy theory that some religious group is trying to control me. It is a fact that a political group is controlling me. It is people that concern me and will never be a religion.

Duramar wrote 28.05.2018, 14:21: #17
Puddle theory is a term coined by Douglas Adams to satirize arguments that the universe is made for man. As stated in Adams's book "The Salmon of Doubt":

Vudoshicage wrote 07.06.2018, 22:51: #18
This is my point: it cannot. Therefore the assumption of randomness is wrong.

Durg wrote 16.06.2018, 19:27: #19
Except, of course, that YHVH God actually breathed-out the very words of Scripture to the men he had chosen to record it, superintending every word to mean what He intends it to mean, when and where.

Kazrarr wrote 22.06.2018, 01:36: #20
Apparently, you didn't read my comment. As I said, this is a very preliminary study and it will take confirmation by other scientists who will then either confirm or correct these results. Evolution is a fact. The explanation of how it happens, the Theory of Evolution can, and will change as new information comes available, and this was already happening with the Gould and Eldridges's "Punctuated Equilibrium" which explained "stasis".

Mukazahn wrote 24.06.2018, 19:29: #21
You're getting the hang of this. But now I'm done.

Ket wrote 27.06.2018, 05:46: #22
Naw, I got Deudeu right

Arashizilkree wrote 02.07.2018, 02:29: #23
Almost forgot my throwback...

Gardakus wrote 04.07.2018, 22:25: #24
Yet this eternal voice of reason changes his mind often.

Say a few words: